Greek prime minister George
Papandreou cancelled the referendum.
Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy called Papandreou back to the “shed”
Wednesday for a tongue-lashing…and worse…to set him straight on the marching
orders he had been given.
And, the Greek prime minister
backed down.
It seems as if Merkel and
Sarkozy believe that there are only two choices in the current debate. The first is that the European Union stay
together and maintain the single currency zone.
The alternative is that the
EU split up with some countries maintaining the single currency zone.
To Merkel and Sarkozy there
really is no choice…the EU stays together and supports the euro.
If the EU stays together and
supports the euro…then the bailouts will continue.
It seems to me that there are
two most likely outcomes to following this path. Of course, there are more but they are all
derivatives of these two in my mind.
First, financial markets will
continue to reject the solution and there will be further “summits” down the
road with more bailouts and more distress.
The ultimate result of following this path will be when the EU finally
decides that the fiscal policies of all countries in the union will have to be
coordinated and there will be fiscal and political union as well as monetary
union.
Some have seen this
conclusion as the missing component of the efforts to achieve the monetary
union right from the start. Others, like
myself, have seen this possibility as the ultimate end to the financial crisis
as we now know it. And, a political
union may have been the goal of some EU “leaders” throughout the turmoil.
If there is going to be a
real “coming together” of the nations in the EU, the “strong” will be the
drivers (Germany and France and who else?) but in order to achieve the final
union the solvency of the laggards (Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal and who
else?) will have to be resolved. That
is, there will have to be some kind of central “Treasury” that will aggregate
all debts and pay off those nations still in the union that are insolvent.
One can look at the American
after its Revolutionary War where Alexander Hamilton opted for a strong central
“Treasury” and the assumption of all of the debts of the states that were then
a part of the United States.
The problem with this
solution?
The problem lies with the
people of the nations within the EU.
Some of these people’s may not want to come under the regime of the
“strong” nations that will be the driving force in a strong, centralized fiscal
EU.
There have been riots and
protests in Greece…and in Spain…and in Portugal…and in Italy…indicating
resistance to the fiscal austerity being imposed on them by especially Germany
and France.
And, the resistance is even
getting more personal. For example, a
Greek newspaper has a cartoon with a German general manipulating two
puppets…the two puppet being the Greek prime minister and another Greek
official. The underlying theme: “The
Germans didn’t succeed in occupying Greece through arms because the Greek
people resisted. They try now to occupy
Greece through the economy.”
Pretty heavy stuff.
The Merkel/Sarkozy path to
fiscal/political union may be a desirable goal but the question that still
needs to be asked is whether or not this goal is consistent with what the
people in these countries want. European
officials have often been accused of being an “elite” that wishes to impose its
will upon the people of Europe. Whether
or not the “elites” can pull off this union without too great of a popular
upheaval is a question that no one can answer at this moment.
The other alternative is that
the financial markets may not allow the “leaders” of Europe to get too much
farther
along this path.
Just today, 10-year Greek
bonds were trading to yield almost 34 percent, almost 3,200 basis points above
the yield on 10-Year German bonds. The
bonds of the Italian government have been trading at the largest spreads above
the German bonds in the euro era. And
the same with the bonds of Portugal.
If these governments have to
pay these kinds of yields on their debt there is no way that they will be able
to get their fiscal budgets under control.
If these governments cannot issue bonds or can only issue them to the
European Central Bank then the fundamental reality of their insolvency will
become more and more of a problem.
Add to this a European
recession, where tax revenues take a further nose-dive, and you only exacerbate
the problem.
I should add that “Super
Mario” Draghi, the new head of the ECB oversaw a reduction in the central
bank’s main policy interest rate in his third day in the new job. The reason for this reduction is to combat
weaknesses being experienced in European economies.
Over-shadowing all of this is
the fear of the European officials of financial “contagion”. The spectre of Lehman Brothers hovers over
Europe. The fear is that if these “officials” let Greece go “insolvent” in a
“disorderly default” kicking off the use of Credit Default Swaps, that there
will be a “spill over” effect moving from the sovereign debt of Italy…and of
Spain…and of Portugal. Then, the concern
spreads to the commercial banks in Europe…remember the stress tests conducted
on these banks did not include a write down of the sovereign debt on their
balance sheets.
The problem Europe is facing
is a solvency problem. This is what
European officials have been trying to deny for the last four years. And, many are still in denial!
Solvency problems do not just
go away! Denying they exist only causes
the problems to get worse!
No comments:
Post a Comment